|
ZenBio
rabbit polyclonal antibodies against human cd8  Rabbit Polyclonal Antibodies Against Human Cd8, supplied by ZenBio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit polyclonal antibodies against human cd8/product/ZenBio Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit polyclonal antibodies against human cd8 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Image Search Results
Journal: Frontiers in Immunology
Article Title: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors regulate macrophage M2 polarization through the MIF/CXCR4 axis to immune escape
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1431535
Figure Lengend Snippet: Cell counts of every cluster in two samples.
Article Snippet: Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence were performed on the tissue microarray with the following antibodies:
Techniques:
Journal: Frontiers in Immunology
Article Title: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors regulate macrophage M2 polarization through the MIF/CXCR4 axis to immune escape
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1431535
Figure Lengend Snippet: Immunohistochemical characterization of CD8, CD68, MIF, CD206 and CXCR4 in GIST samples.
Article Snippet: Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence were performed on the tissue microarray with the following antibodies:
Techniques: Immunohistochemical staining
Journal: Frontiers in Immunology
Article Title: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors regulate macrophage M2 polarization through the MIF/CXCR4 axis to immune escape
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1431535
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) (A) There were differences in CD8+T cell infiltration among different groups (0.35 ± 0.15 vs 0.27 ± 0.10 vs 0.09 ± 0.02, P =0.003); (B) There were differences in the infiltration of CD68+macrophage cells among different groups (0.38 ± 0.09 vs 0.64 ± 0.17 vs 0.98 ± 0.19, P =0.03). (B) (A) As the risk increases, the expression of CXCR4 gradually increases, and the difference is statistically significant (0.43 ± 0.24 vs 0.90 ± 0.68 vs 1.64 ± 0.53, P <0.001); (B) As the risk increases, the expression of MIF gradually increases, and the difference is statistically significant (0.009 ± 0.003 vs 0.70 ± 0.02 vs 0.12 ± 0.03, P <0.001); (C) As the risk increases, the expression of CD206 gradually increases, and the difference is statistically significant (0.04 ± 0.01 vs 0.07 ± 0.0.02 vs 0.15 ± 0.03, P<0.001); The statistical method is non-parametric test, n=80, * P <0.05; ** P <0.01.
Article Snippet: Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence were performed on the tissue microarray with the following antibodies:
Techniques: Expressing